|
TREATISE ON GRAVITY AND GRAVITOMAGNETISM TrAIté de gravité et de gravitomagnétisme |
|
Joseph NDURIRI, Toulouse, FRANCE, 31 octobre
2005, ++33(0)6-31-13-61-55, nduriri@voilà.fr Works as an Avionics Flight Computer Engineer in Toulouse
FRANCE Graduated in; 1) The National School of the Civil Aviation ENAC - Radar microwaves in Toulouse FRANCE 2) The National School of Applied Sciences INSA - Micro-electronics in Toulouse FRANCE 3) The National Institute of Technology IUT - Electronics in Toulon FRANCE |
Abstract
By honest observation, analogy and intuition the laws that govern physical
phenomena can be deduced, this approach is know as the frontier physics
evidence. The obtained laws should be in conformity with all the scientific
observations that are accepted by the international scientific community. A central concept in science and the scientific method is
that all evidence must be empirical, or empirically based, that is, dependent
on evidence that is observable by the senses. Such methods are opposed to
theoretical ab initio methods which are purely deductive and based on first
principles that could lead to incoherent theories, maths is just a tool that
helps us to have a rational approach to frontier physics but the approach to
frontier physics must be guided by evidence that is observable by the senses,
in our case, it is the astronomical observations that should guide us in
validating the Treatise on Gravity and Gravitomagnetism.
We shall not attempt do define the nature of gravity but we shall
define the laws that govern the remote forces of gravity by elaborating the
Treatise on Gravity and Gravitomagnetism at far area interaction. In the coming
years we shall attempt to define the near area electric and gravitational field
interaction in order to explain electron forbidden bond, spectrometer
characteristics and the co-habitation of protons in the atomic nuclease. The
near area interaction does not obey the inverse square law; it probably obeys a
wave like curve enveloped by pseudo inverse square law.
We know that the electrostatic interaction inverse square law (Law of Coulomb)
and the gravitational interaction inverse square law (Law of Newton) are both
governed by the same geometrical law in a static regime; we know that the electrical
and the gravitational interaction are propagated at a finite speed. In pure
mathematics, the inverse square law corresponds to the “dilution” of a field by
the increase of the surface area of a sphere 4pr2, sound and
electromagnetic waves power obeys this “dilution” law. The surface area of a
sphere is the derivative of the volume of a sphere 4pr3/3 with
respect to the radius r. We know that in computer science an CMOS AND gate is
composed of transistors in series, this is equivalent to two water tapes in
series and an CMOS OR gate is composed of transistors in parallel, this is
equivalent to two water tapes in parallel, the truth table of the electric
current gates is the same as the truth table of the masse (water) current tape
gates. In the first case we have an electric current and the second case we
have a masse (water) current. Electronic and mechanical oscillators are both
governed by the same laws (simple harmonic motion). Where the inductance is
equivalent to inertia and capacity is equivalent to the spring elasticity (the
elasticity of a diaphragm fixed in the cross section of a ring tube filled with
a liquid). The electrical resistance is equivalent a constriction in a liquid
tube (medical thermometer use this constriction principle to enable accurate
readings). Ignoring losses, the sum of inertia and elastic (inductance and
capacity) energy is constant in simple harmonic motion system. By ignoring the
symbolic physical quantities and constants, we know that there is no difference
between an electrical system and a mechanical system, especially in simple
harmonic motion. The two systems are equivalent; Fourier Transformation
(Laplace Transformation as in MATLAB software) is applicable on both systems.
Since Lorentz Transformation is applicable to the electric field, it is logical
to think that Lorentz Transformation should be applicable on the gravitational
field. In order to cross the threshold of the frontier physics evidence, our
honest approach should be validated by astronomical observations because this
is the only true basis in modern scientific methods.
Our approach is in accordance with the model published by Maxwell in 1891, in
his third edition of Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism. It is by honest
analogy to mechanics that Maxwell elaborated the Treatise on Electricity and
Magnetism. By analogy to Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism done by Maxwell,
it is logical to elaborate the Treatise on Gravity and Gravitomagnetism by
using Lorentz Transformation as a mathematical tool without forgetting the
specificity of gravity, thus masses of the same sign attract each other. By
symmetry, logically masses of opposite signs should repulse each other but this
is just a conjecture.
We know that in a dynamic regime, the so-called magnetic field is just a
relativistic effect due to distortion of the electric field orthogonal to the
relative movement of a charged particle with respect to an observer. It would
be logical to think that a remote force in a dynamic regime, which we shall
call gravitomagnetic field is just a relativistic effect due to distortion of
the gravitational field orthogonal to the relative movement of a masse particle
with respect to an observer. This remote force, thus gravitomagnetic field does
not have the same nature as the magnetic field but should logically be governed
by the same geometrical laws as the magnetic field in a dynamic regime. This
honest approach is a major step stone towards the frontier physics evidence.
We know that science is not a dogma; if we agree on that point then we have the
right to question the validity of the Big Bang theory. By using relativistic
Doppler effect we show that the gamma rays bursts and red
shift cosmic microwave background radiation are
part of the frontier physics evidence. This does not necessary mean that the
Universe is expanding. At υ = 95% the speed of light, the probability of
detecting red shift is more that 70% and for
very low speeds above zero (υ > 0), the probability is more than 50%.
The red shift is necessary but not sufficient to
support the Big Bang theory.
We know that the Einstein equation of masse energy equivalence is given by; E =
mc2, we deduce the momentum of an photon is equal to mc = E/c
(masse times velocity) and with the help of the kinetic or collision theory of
gasses elaborated by Maxwell as a mathematical tool, we elaborate the light
dynamics thereby obtaining an accurate light radiation pressure equation that
includes the coefficient of reflection. We then postulate the possibility of
devising a light rocket engine that could propel us to the stars.
In accordance with the Treatise on Gravity and Gravitomagnetism, a gravity
transversal wave generator of type stretch C has been devised and tested in
Toulouse (29 September 2007). An independent laboratory will validate
this gravity transversal wave generator.
Since the quasi stationary orthodox gravity theories do not offer a
global and coherent explanation concerning gravity perturbations, can there be
a physical science work of more importance than obtaining an understanding of
these perturbations and seeking interaction with the remote forces of gravity?
The facts are there, the facts remain the keystone in which the stability of a
theory must be tested.
Much has been said about gravitodynamics, gravitomagnetism, black
holes thermodynamics, and Big Bang theory. The Treatise on Gravity and
Gravitomagnetism gives a global Cartesian and coherent quantitative analysis
approach that is in conformity with the astronomical observations and that
could be fed in a simulator ready to use. When we shall have time, we shall
write free software in C++. We can create distributed objects in a teamwork via
Internet controlled by clock tics to simulate cosmological invents.
The Treatise on Gravity and Gravitomagnetism has determined the
gravitodynamics New Newton’s Law by taking into account the relativistic
velocity of the interacting masse particles contrary to the quasi-stationary
gravity law of Newton. The Treatise on Gravity and Gravitomagnetism and Doppler
effect explain the following 9 cosmological blunders of the last 85 years in a
Cartesian way;
1) Big Bang theory incoherencies by relativistic Doppler effect,
Treatise on Gravity and Gravitomagnetism, gravitodynamics.
2) Mercury perihelion advance by Treatise on Gravity and
Gravitomagnetism, gravitodynamics.
3) The Allais Effect - gravity waves by Treatise on Gravity and
Gravitomagnetism, gravitodynamics.
4) The pioneer anomaly by Treatise on Gravity and Gravitomagnetism,
gravitodynamics.
5) The galaxy disk shape flatness by Treatise on Gravity and
Gravitomagnetism, gravitodynamics.
6) The spiral form aspiration of matter by the accretion disk by
Treatise on Gravity and Gravitomagnetism, gravitodynamics.
7) The matter bipolar jets trajectory by Treatise on Gravity and Gravitomagnetism,
gravitodynamics.
8) Galaxy rotation curve flatness by Treatise on Gravity and
Gravitomagnetism, gravitodynamics.
9) The source of matter bipolar jets by Treatise on Gravity and
Gravitomagnetism, gravitodynamics.
European
Space Agency Thanks to the team for its
experimental works that confirmed gravitomagnetism; Dr
Martin Tajmar and Dr Clovis J. de Matos.
I would like to thank Thierry de Mees and
D.Turanyamin
for their works in gravitomagnetism. Thanks to my compatriot (KENYA), 2004 Nobel
Peace Prize Winner Wangari Maathai for
her dedication in the promotion of women rights and environment conservation.
SUBJECT |
PAGE |
Summary |
6 |
Linear Vector Gravity |
6 |
New Newton’s law |
6 |
|
Gravitomagnetism masse law |
6 |
Gravitomagnetism current law |
7 |
Gravitomagnetism field law |
8 |
|
Lorentz gravitomagnetic force law |
8 |
|
Gravitomagnetic attractive and
repulsive forces |
9 |
|
Gravitational waves radiation |
10 |
|
Gravitomagnetic induction law |
12 |
Two-body problem |
13 |
Energy conservation law |
14 |
Physical constants |
15 |
Physical quantities |
15 |
Detailed description of Treatise on Gravity and Gravitomagnetism |
16 |
Objective |
16 |
Hypothesis |
16 |
Method |
16 |
EXISTENCE OF MAGNETIC FIELD |
16 |
EXISTENCE OF GRAVITOMAGNETIC FIELD |
24 |
Masse current of infinite length |
32 |
Coupling coefficient between the magnetic and the gravitomagnetic field |
34 |
Masse and charged particle unified law |
37 |
Ring masse current |
38 |
The gravitomagnetic field around a ring masse current |
39 |
|
Disc masse current |
40 |
|
Full sphere masse current |
42 |
|
Gravitomagnetic
field in Earths poles |
43 |
|
Gravity probe C |
44 |
|
Measuring the gravitomagnetic
field in the North Pole |
46 |
|
Black holes
thermodynamics |
47 |
|
Synchrotron cone shape radiation |
53 |
|
Synchrotron far area low frequency radiation |
55 |
|
Doppler Effect on gravitational field |
56 |
|
Gravitational synchrotron
radiation and B-flat “sound waves” |
57 |
|
Iron broadband radiation near the black hole |
58 |
|
How can matter escape from a black whole? |
59 |
|
Why are black holes black? |
60 |
|
Comparison between the Sun and
and a black hole |
61 |
|
Bipolar jets emission |
62 |
|
Bipolar jets trajectory |
63 |
|
Black hole, energy to masse converter |
64 |
|
Propagation of gravitomagnetic
transversal waves |
65 |
|
Gravitational waves radiation |
70 |
|
Electrogravitomagnetic wave
energy |
73 |
|
Electrogravitomagnetic
wave equation of energy |
74 |
9 cosmological blunders of the last 85 years solved |
75 |
1) Two-body problem |
75 |
|
2) Big Bang theory the 9th
cosmological blunder? |
76 |
|
3) Allais Effect |
80 |
|
4) Pioneer anomaly |
90 |
|
5) Gravitomagnetic effect on the
shape of galaxies |
93 |
|
6) Spiral aspiration of matter |
94 |
|
7) Bipolar jets trajectory |
95 |
|
8) Galaxy rotation curve flatness |
96 |
|
9) Bipolar matter escape
tunnel |
97 |
|
Light dynamics |
99 |
|
Light momentum |
99 |
|
Gravity wave generator |
101 |
|
Time and space delay |
103 |
Treatise on GRAVITY AND gravitomagnetism